TheoBaker0497 · 11 May 2025, 21:05 UTC
Ask the supplier for the loaded tool through entry and exit, using your actual machine door positions; I'd hold the purchase decision until they can show that.
15 pointsRequested. They only had the machine brochure.
10 pointsSend measurements from the installed machine, particularly anything changed since the brochure; our machine had acquired a guard bracket nobody had put on the layout.
19 pointsWe have an added door catch. Measuring that too.
19 pointsThere you go. Small bits count when they're in the way.
13 pointsDoes the tool drawing include the blank after gripping? Its withdrawal orientation may occupy different space from the blank still sitting in the fixture.
9 pointsPickup shown. Held withdrawal absent. Added to the request.
9 pointsCan maintenance still reach that door catch and the fixture with the proposed base installed, or would routine work require moving the robot?
6 pointsFixture access remains. Door catch access needs checking with maintenance.
17 pointsA simple dummy of the loaded tool can help everyone see the tight spots at the review. It won't replace the supplier's route check, but it makes omissions obvious.
20 pointsWho is doing the final combined layout? I wouldn't want each reply to become a different approved sketch.
8 pointsIntegrator owns it. Measurements sent; review pending. No arm ordered.
7 pointsLet us know where they end up putting it; the catch sounds like the sort of detail that can move the whole base.
6 pointsThis discussion is closed to new replies after six months without activity. Last activity: .