NaomiBrown0941 · 14 Oct 2025, 20:54 UTC
Can each supplier describe the physical or logical event behind their ready signal without using the word ready? That should expose which two meanings need separate names.
14 pointsUse request received and loading area available as separate states, with owners and conditions.
11 pointsOur training interface had the same agreeable word covering different events. The normal sequence looked fine until we asked what happened when receipt was confirmed but the work could not start.
17 pointsImran, did they also distinguish completion from acknowledgement?
-8 pointsBoth suppliers now describe receipt separately from area availability, and we have added work complete as another event; they still disagree about who owns cancellation after a communication loss.
7 pointsCaleb, yes, receipt and completion needed separate definitions on ours. Naomi's cancellation question sounds like the next missing agreement, not something a rename can settle.
20 pointsNaomi, what can each side establish about an accepted request after the connection returns? Cancellation depends on the state of the work, not merely on the connection having dropped.
6 pointsKeep the ordinary job agreement separate from the independently assessed safety functions.
3 pointsAnd do not turn an unknown outcome into permission to repeat loading.
12 pointsWe have asked both owners to list their retained request and result information for the recovery review; normal wording is agreed, cancellation and reconciliation remain unfinished, and the safety review stays separate.
11 pointsThis discussion is closed to new replies after six months without activity. Last activity: .