The faster FR10 demonstration started with a different puck tray

Yes, both filled beforehand; neither shows replenishment or a tray change.

Ask for those parts too. Someone has to do them between the nice transfers.

It is wider than our rack slots, so storage would change; downstream handling can use it without transferring the pucks again.

Then price the storage change alongside the tray. Don't reject it just for being new, but don't hide the rack because it isn't exciting robot kit either.

How many of the wider trays do you need circulating, including any held for checks or cleaning? Initial quantity has a way of meaning enough for the demonstration and no more.

And can the operator lift and position a filled one comfortably? Wider might mean more than a rack problem.

Jonas, stores is working out the circulating quantity; Sofia, our operator wants a filled sample before deciding on handling, so I have requested one rather than assuming the empty tray tells us enough.

Nina's alternate quote would be useful. Even if they keep the wider tray, you get to see what it is saving and what it is asking you to change.

Current-tray option is now offered at a slower cycle, with no rack change; the wider-tray proposal still needs its full stock and storage cost, so neither has won.

The filled sample arrived and our operator prefers sliding it onto a support rather than carrying it; supplier is reviewing that arrangement, and replenishment and recovery demonstrations are still pending.

Has the support proposal been priced with the wider-tray option now?