A bare housing weight in two complete-tool offers

AmyBaker0467 · 26 Jul 2025, 01:08 UTC

Closed
AM
AmyBaker0467
I'm comparing UR5e tooling for a motor housing, but both offers call it suitable from the housing mass alone; our long fingers and adapter apparently weigh nothing until after purchase.

8 replies

JA
JasperChan1073
Replying to AmyBaker0467

Ask for the mass and centre of gravity of the whole loaded tool. Include the actual adapter.

19 points
AM
AmyBaker0467
Replying to JasperChan1073

One offer now includes the gripper and fingers, but the mounting adapter is still absent from its assembly sheet.

10 points
JA
JasperChan1073
Replying to AmyBaker0467

Send it back for completion. Otherwise the review starts from the wrong assembly.

24 points
DA
DavidBrooks0867
Replying to AmyBaker0467

I'd include the intended transfer in the supplier's assessment too. We had a classroom example where everyone could add the masses, but nobody had asked where the load sat or what motion was being proposed. A total on its own was not the whole question.

3 points
AM
AmyBaker0467
Replying to DavidBrooks0867

I've sent the proposed transfer and fixture drawing with the missing-item request. Supplier says the adapter choice may change the offset as well as the mass, which is rather the point.

8 points
HA
HanaAdams0100
Replying to AmyBaker0467

Who pays for a different adapter if the complete assessment rejects the quoted one?

4 points
JA
JasperChan1073
Replying to HanaAdams0100

Settle that before ordering. Also make sure both offers use the same required grip position for the comparison.

7 points
AM
AmyBaker0467
Replying to JasperChan1073

No order placed. I've asked both suppliers to confirm the grip position and complete assembly, with any resulting tool changes included in their revised offer; suitability remains open.

21 points

Discussion closed

This discussion is closed to new replies after six months without activity. Last activity: .