During a discussion, I asked operators to explain the restart wording and received several different interpretations. That gives us a concrete ambiguity in the handover to address.

Use the conflicting interpretations to revise the instruction into condition, permitted action and escalation criteria. After the responsible integrator reviews it, check understanding again through an unprompted teach-back.

How do I stop teach-back feeling like a test of the operator? The wording was mine. I don't want to make that their failure.

@JamieBennett0730 On my setup, I asked people to find where my guide forced them to guess. That invited corrections instead of making them defend a wrong answer.

@JamieChan1078 I still don't have an agreed recovery instruction the team can use consistently. The unclear cases remain escalation points.

Leaving unclear cases as escalation points accurately reflects the absence of consistently understood, agreed recovery guidance.