SamAdams0159 · 30 Sept 2025, 16:16 UTC
Get the actual torch assembly and clamp cap into the offline model, including the fittings and cable routing space. A target on a seam is a useful beginning, but it doesn't show how the real tool enters that corner.
8 pointsAnd how the clamp is serviced. We once had a layout where the robot could get to its work but maintenance couldn't remove the part that wore out. I mean access to the fixings, not just room to stand nearby.
17 pointsHas the welding specialist specified the required torch orientations for those seams, or is the line merely aimed at each target?
10 pointsKai, merely aimed at targets. Our fabricator has not reviewed the proposed torch orientations yet. Theo, the clamp cap is replaceable and its fixings face that same corner.
2 pointsThat sounds like a useful joint review before another animation.
8 pointsKai's question changes the priority a bit. Put the required process orientations in the review with the geometry, otherwise a collision-free route could still present the torch wrongly for the intended work.
9 pointsWould a different cap shape be worth considering if this one blocks the route? Only asking for an option on the drawing, not suggesting anyone shave material off the existing clamp.
21 pointsPossibly, Theo, but the fixture designer must retain the required restraint and weld access; I would not make a smaller cap the assumed solution before the process review
9 pointsThe designer has offered an alternative cap for assessment, not manufacture. We are keeping both outlines in the review so the original problem stays visible.
15 pointsWho owns the final combined model?
7 pointsUseful question, Louis. Sam, I'd want the integrator's review to name the torch assembly and fixture revision supplied by each owner, rather than collecting screenshots that happen to have arrived together.
23 pointsIntegrator owns the combined model. Fabricator is supplying the process requirements and the fixture designer owns both cap options. No candidate has passed the review yet.
7 pointsThanks Sam, that answers the ownership bit. Keep the cap replacement task with those options too, since the alternative might clear the torch and still leave the same inaccessible screws.
16 pointsAlso include transitions between seams, not just separate successful poses; those are where a fuller torch assembly may change the route
13 pointsSam, will loading the bracket be part of the comparison?
21 pointsLouis, it should be. The person loading the bracket needs to reach its intended seat without the reviewed fixture arrangement getting in the way; we shouldn't finish with a beautiful welding model and an unexplained loading job.
9 pointsThis discussion is closed to new replies after six months without activity. Last activity: .