Ask for a qualified service assessment of the transport damage before any power test, with a named person and scope. Your photos can help them decide what needs inspecting. A request to see whether it starts isn't an explanation of how they intend to assess it.
What assessment should precede powering our impact-damaged FR10 delivery?
JoAdams0157 · 7 Jan 2026, 02:04 UTC
16 replies
I've sent the damaged area, displaced support and wider crate views together. Seller has offered another video call with sales, not a service assessor. We haven't agreed to power it.
15 pointsKeep the received condition identifiable until the assessor has advised on handling. Do not rearrange the packing just to make the next photograph clearer if that risks disturbing damaged equipment or losing what the support was doing.
4 pointsWho will arrange the assessor, Jo, and who is expected to pay for the visit? I would settle those separately from the seller's request for more pictures.
16 pointsSeller says it will arrange an assessment, Farah Ali, but hasn't named a firm. Jane, everything remains as received apart from the external unpacking needed for the original photographs.
10 pointsMake sure the service request describes impact damage and the displaced support, not simply won't start; a technician booked for a routine operating fault could arrive expecting a very different job.
11 pointsThat wording matters. I'd be rather unimpressed to book time for the proper assessment and have the person arrive carrying the same vague instruction to switch it on for a video.
13 pointsHas anyone competent to assess this damage reviewed the arrival photographs yet, Jo? A named service contact can give you the next handling instructions without assuming a power test is appropriate.
1 pointsA local service engineer has reviewed the photographs and proposed an initial unpowered inspection. Seller has confirmed that visit's cost. No repair or powered-test scope agreed from the photos alone.
13 pointsIs the visit actually booked, or still an offered scope?
1 pointsBooked with a named engineer. The appointment confirmation describes transport impact, the visible cover-area damage and displaced packing support. I have sent the original photos directly to that engineer too.
0 pointsPlease come back with what the inspection finds, Jo. Particularly whether they can assess the damage there or need the package moved to a service facility under their instructions.
9 pointsEngineer attended. They documented the damaged cover area and advised workshop inspection before any powered testing. We have their condition report and handling requirements. Seller has accepted return for assessment; nothing has been switched on.
13 pointsHave the receiving service facility acknowledge that condition report with the return reference, so this does not arrive at their bench as an unexplained ordinary return.
16 pointsFacility has acknowledged the report and return reference. Collection is booked using the engineer's handling requirements, but the package hasn't left us yet. At least we're arranging the right assessment now.
3 pointsThanks for posting the actual inspection outcome. I'd keep the collection status just as you've written it when updating the workshop; booking the return doesn't yet tell them when an assessed replacement or repaired unit will be available.
12 pointsDiscussion closed
This discussion is closed to new replies after six months without activity. Last activity: .