HanaBennett0709 · 23 Feb 2025, 08:54 UTC
Point them at the agreed release observation and ask for the whole sequence, because another close-up of the pick won't answer it
11 pointsSent that. Also can't identify the contact pads in the existing shot. Two missing observations.
17 pointsAsk for a tool close-up tied to the continuous run, with whatever order identification you agreed visible too
25 pointsWe didn't agree an identification shot. We did agree our sample and fixture. Neither is clear.
7 pointsCould you send them a marked photo of your fixture so the person filming knows exactly what has to be visible?
18 pointsYep, and describe identification as an additional clarification, not an agreement they broke if it wasn't in the original terms
15 pointsDoes the current clip show the fixture at all, even before the cut?
3 pointsThat matters, because a poor angle and a completely absent fixture need different answers from whoever ran the test
12 pointsList what the footage establishes and what remains unseen. That lets you acknowledge the visible lift without accepting a placement demonstration that stops before placement.
7 pointsAnd keep the request short enough to forward to their operator, otherwise the useful shot list disappears inside the purchasing argument
13 pointsFixture edge is visible, Anil. Seller now says the camera stopped recording, not the cycle.
9 pointsThey've promised another recording with the pads, sample and release visible. Sent our marked fixture photo. Still awaiting it.
11 pointsThat explanation is plausible, but the missing placement is still missing until they send it; don't let the explanation stand in for the recording
10 pointsThis discussion is closed to new replies after six months without activity. Last activity: .