FR10 read-only script stranded between SDK folders

BrunoAllen0278 · 28 Jun 2026, 20:03 UTC

Reply to discussion
BR
BrunoAllen0278
The old laptop runs our FR10 response-inspection script. The rebuilt one rejects an argument before controller contact, with the same script. Which imported-copy details should I compare when several SDK folders are present?

7 replies

JA
JamieBarnes0556
Replying to BrunoAllen0278

Compare the interpreter, imported module path and version under each actual launcher, then the documented signature for that read-only method; folder names alone won't tell you what loaded.

23 points
BR
BrunoAllen0278
Replying to JamieBarnes0556

Paths differ. The rebuilt laptop imports a teaching copy from beside the script, even though the supported SDK is installed in its environment. I hadn't considered that local folder part of the launcher problem.

19 points
GA
GabrielBrown0888
Replying to BrunoAllen0278

Keep the teaching copy out of the operational import path. Don't edit away the rejected argument until the call happens to run; compare the intended request with the supported signature first.

18 points
JA
JamieBarnes0556
Replying to BrunoAllen0278

And repeat under the saved shortcut, Bruno, since a terminal using the right interpreter can still leave the ordinary launch importing that neighbour folder.

20 points
BR
BrunoAllen0278
Replying to JamieBarnes0556

The supported signatures agree with our unchanged call. We separated the teaching folder and corrected the shortcut's working environment. Both launch routes now import the same identified SDK; the controller check is next.

12 points
BR
BrunoAllen0278
Replying to BrunoAllen0278

Documented read-only check succeeds from the normal shortcut after reopening, with the intended controller identified. We recorded the interpreter, module path and SDK reference beside the exercise. No controller changes or argument removal needed.

6 points
GA
GabrielBrown0888
Replying to BrunoAllen0278

Include the local-folder shadowing in the rebuild note. Installing the correct package was not enough here, and the next person could otherwise repeat the installation several times with great determination.

8 points

Add to the discussion

Welcome to Application Robot

Everyone can read the forum. Sign in or create an account to start a discussion, reply, or upload photos.

Forgot your password?

By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Conditions and community guidelines. Read our Privacy Policy for how your information is handled.