LouisArcher0398 · 26 Jul 2026, 03:15 UTC
Write down the tray differences first. You might already have enough information to explain why the clips cannot rank the arms, before asking anyone to film again.
-2 pointsAnd compare complete handling proposals. Requiring identical hardware would be the wrong kind of fairness. Different tools can be legitimate, but they must cope with the same agreed input conditions and acceptance requirements.
10 pointsLucy, yes, though a supplier may propose changing the tray itself. Louis needs to know whether that change is allowed and what it costs, rather than simply excluding a potentially useful proposal.
14 pointsInclude whoever prepares and replenishes the trays in that decision. A tidier input may be practical, but the work needed to create it has to belong somewhere in the proposal.
3 pointsTray changes are possible. I'd missed the preparation labour in the tidy-tray option.
17 pointsThen Nina's qualification applies. Agree the required output and incoming caps, permit declared tray changes, and assess the whole method. My same-input point was too compressed if it sounded like the current tray must be sacred.
7 pointsHow much of either clip includes replenishment? The clean middle of a run often gets all the attention.
4 pointsNeither shows it. Only loaded trays and successful moves, which explains some of my uncertainty.
-1 pointsRequest a demonstration scope that includes preparation, replenishment and the handling you need to assess. Ask suppliers to declare assistance and interventions. You can still value a good clip while recognising the work it leaves unobserved.
12 pointsWho will run the proposed process after handover? That person's expected skill and support access should be part of the comparison, especially if tray preparation needs judgement.
16 pointsCount rejects and recovery time too, with agreed definitions. A supplier should not improve the apparent result by silently removing awkward caps before the timed portion begins.
1 pointsThanks, Jamie. I've added normal operator preparation and support to the common brief.
18 pointsBefore requesting dates, get both suppliers to say which parts of that brief they can demonstrate. An agreed omission is still an omission, but at least it won't surprise you afterward.
14 pointsBrief sent. No revised tests back yet, and I'm leaving the shortlist unranked.
10 pointsDoes the brief let you record a proposed tray change as a separate costed option? That would preserve the potentially useful idea without treating the tidy tray in the old video as free preparation.
13 pointsBy creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Conditions and community guidelines. Read our Privacy Policy for how your information is handled.