Which UR5e indication belongs with our housing-loading stop?

Tray present. Taken after the operator replaced the tray, not during the stop.

Then label it as the later state. It should not be sent as proof that the tray was present during the stop.

And ask what support means by ready. Present can be one input to a larger condition. You could have a readable green lamp and still be answering a question they did not ask, which is a wonderfully efficient way to spend another week exchanging screenshots.

Await receiving tray ready. The clip does not show the individual input page.

Ask support to name the source conditions behind that message for the fitted tray arrangement, then ask your technician whether the retained history covers them at that occurrence. The current page cannot supply their old values.

Does support have the actual tray and insert identity? My last ticket had two names for the same fitted part, which made the signal discussion harder than it needed to be.

They have the carrier name. The removable insert is missing from our ticket. I'll add its identity.

Callum's point is useful. Amara, include the physical label and their drawing name together if those differ. Don't make the remote person recognise the insert from a wide shot of the arm.

Can maintenance still retrieve the stop's earlier history?

Maintenance preserved the full available range. We don't yet know whether it records the needed source conditions.

That is the question for support and controls now. Send the preserved occurrence with the exact fixture mapping; a longer file is useful only if someone can identify what in it answers the wait.

Keep the operator's expected next step too. That may expose a missing handover explanation even if the retained signals are insufficient to diagnose the occurrence.

Callum, yes, but distinguish what the operator expected from what the system actually requested. I've seen an expectation copied into a sequence report and quietly become an observed event.

Operator expected unloading to continue after tray exchange. That is their account, not an event in the trace.

Was that expectation in the handover sheet?

The sheet says continue after exchange. It does not explain the readiness decision or who confirms it.

Then there are two useful questions: explain the captured wait if the evidence allows it, and explain the exchange to the next operator. Don't let an incomplete trace become a reason to leave the second one unanswered.

Both questions sent to the applications contact, with the insert identity. Thanks Reece. No stop cause established yet.