ChloeBrooks0831 · 19 Dec 2025, 19:17 UTC
The full tool holding the blank, against a survey of the actual open door, through the required movement. Also the setter's fixture-change space; somebody has to live with the layout
7 pointsTooling has two possible adapters. Neither is selected. Should both go into that comparison?
14 pointsYes, as identified options with their complete assemblies. Don't combine the shorter adapter's envelope with the other option's price and call it one candidate.
20 pointsDoes either assembly include hose fittings, Chloe? Those are often left as somebody else's detail.
21 pointsOne includes them. The other drawing stops at the gripper body. I've requested the missing arrangement.
13 pointsAnd the blank at its intended grip depth.
16 pointsThe actual door survey can proceed while those options are completed. Otherwise you risk discovering the same missing obstruction twice, once for each nice new tool drawing
11 pointsHave the integrator own that combined comparison. Separate sketches from tooling and the machine surveyor are useful inputs, not two independent approvals.
10 pointsIntegrator owns it. Setter has added the fixture-removal route. Open-door survey remains outstanding.
20 pointsWho supplies the adapter if one is chosen? Include its identity in the replacement-tool handover.
19 pointsStill no accepted route, then.
18 pointsCorrect, Theo. Toby, tooling supplier for either adapter; the selected assembly would get one controlled parts list.
9 pointsKeep both loaded withdrawal and empty return in the route review when the survey arrives. Reaching the fixture does not show that the released tool can leave it.
13 pointsThis discussion is closed to new replies after six months without activity. Last activity: .