CalebAllen0319 · 26 Jun 2025, 15:54 UTC
Find the readings before straightening, if any, and tie them to individual brackets. Otherwise you only know what the corrected parts measured, not what the fixture produced.
20 pointsNo pre-correction sheet found. There is a clamped alignment check, with different reference faces.
1 pointsThen why is someone comparing those dimensions? We found different datums hiding under the same word 'checked'. Get the old instruction beside the final one before spending another meeting subtracting unrelated numbers.
25 pointsOn another bracket review we found the fixture copy belonged to an older gusset. Which part and fixture revisions do your sheets actually identify?
3 pointsBracket D on both. Fixture sheet says B; the proposed copy says A. I'm asking why.
25 pointsCould stores still have the B fixture drawing? I'd search that before asking someone to reverse-engineer the old photographs. Or rather, ask tooling who holds the controlled copy, not just the nearest folder
10 pointsTooling found B. It includes a support absent from A. Purpose isn't described in the archived change note.
17 pointsAsk the old setter and welding lead about that support, with the drawing in front of them. I'd avoid transferring it as a requirement until its role is understood.
8 pointsAnd ask who did the straightening. The new cell doesn't get that labour for free just because it sits outside the fixture drawing. Does the proposed layout leave anywhere for it if it's still needed?
23 pointsCaleb, keep the missing released measurement visible in the trial request. Discovering revision B is useful, but you still haven't found an untouched bracket result to compare.
20 pointsLayout assumed no straightening. That assumption is on hold; current-part trial still needs welding and quality agreement.
18 pointsThis discussion is closed to new replies after six months without activity. Last activity: .