UR5e puck demo with a tray we do not receive

MayaChan1084 · 7 Jan 2026, 07:33 UTC

Closed
MA
MayaChan1084
The UR5e demo uses prepared puck trays. The other uses our incoming trays. Which whole job should I compare?

13 replies

FA
FarahAllen0330
Replying to MayaChan1084

Compare from the same incoming condition to the same finished-tray handover, with all preparation and clearing included; different tooling is fine if its work and limits are visible.

12 points
MA
MayaChan1084
Replying to FarahAllen0330

UR5e supplier expects us to refill its dedicated tray first. Other offer starts from the incoming one.

0 points
TO
TobyAllen0318
Replying to MayaChan1084

Who currently handles the pucks before that incoming tray reaches the station, Maya? I would include any preparation your present flow already needs, not give the baseline a free start.

8 points
LU
LucaArcher0352
Replying to MayaChan1084

Could the dedicated tray replace the incoming tray earlier in the process, or would it definitely add a transfer? That might change whether its preparation is extra work or just moved work

14 points
MA
MayaChan1084
Replying to LucaArcher0352

Incoming trays come from an outside process. We cannot change that supply. Dedicated tray means another transfer here.

17 points
TO
TobyAllen0318
Replying to MayaChan1084

Then show that transfer and empty-tray clearing in the UR5e offer; I would still let it demonstrate the complete proposed route rather than reject it from the extra step alone.

14 points
FA
FarahChan1113
Replying to MayaChan1084

Keep the same puck variation and incoming condition in both demonstrations too, so neither gains a quiet advantage from a hand-picked set of easy samples.

25 points
FA
FarahAllen0330
Replying to MayaChan1084

And involve the person who would do that re-traying in the comparison. The added work may be manageable, but the demo operator should not be the only person deciding that.

17 points
MA
MayaChan1084
Replying to FarahAllen0330

Our operator is joining both trials. Same retained puck set and incoming-tray types agreed. Preparation is inside the timed boundary.

22 points
LU
LucaArcher0352
Replying to MayaChan1084

Will you also count the stop to change product, Maya? A dedicated tray might make transfer clearer and still require more work whenever the next puck type arrives

19 points
MA
MayaChan1084
Replying to LucaArcher0352

Yes, changeover and clearing included. No free dedicated-tray refill hiding between timed runs.

7 points
MA
MayaChan1084
Replying to MayaChan1084

Both complete trials finished. Both transferred the agreed pucks, but our operator's extra re-traying outweighed the UR5e option's faster handling. Other option had simpler changeovers too. We're comparing the final complete prices now.

4 points
MA
MayaChan1084
Replying to MayaChan1084

Selected the offer using our incoming trays. Whole-job cost and operator work fit us better. This comparison doesn't say one arm is generally better; the preparation difference decided this job.

14 points

Discussion closed

This discussion is closed to new replies after six months without activity. Last activity: .