Our FR10 layer puts two carton supports above gaps

GraceChen1190 · 12 Jun 2026, 07:48 UTC

Reply to discussion
GR
GraceChen1190
The alternating pattern fits. Two rotated cartons don't have support beneath their bearing edges. Who reviews that with tooling?

14 replies

EL
ElliotAdams0161
Replying to GraceChen1190

Packaging and tool designer together. Show filled-carton bearing areas, not just the outside rectangle.

15 points
GR
GraceChen1190
Replying to ElliotAdams0161

Packaging has the insert drawing. Tooling only received carton dimensions. That explains part of this.

13 points
VI
VictorBaker0446
Replying to GraceChen1190

Make the lower layer visible beneath those bearing areas, Grace, so packaging can assess the actual spans rather than assuming every rotated carton is equally unsupported.

15 points
EL
ElliotAdams0161
Replying to VictorBaker0446

Include pallet-edge positions too. Different support underneath even when the carton orientation matches.

9 points
GR
GraceChen1190
Replying to ElliotAdams0161

The edge position is worse than the middle. I've marked both for packaging.

10 points
JA
JasperCarter0986
Replying to GraceChen1190

Our purchasing comparison once priced the densest drawing and ignored the handling needed to make it work, so I'd ask for a lower-count candidate alongside this one if dispatch is willing to consider the extra pallets.

23 points
GR
GraceChen1190
Replying to JasperCarter0986

Dispatch will consider fewer cartons. They want the extra pallet movements costed first.

15 points
VI
VictorBaker0446
Replying to GraceChen1190

That is a reasonable comparison, provided both candidates get the same packaging assessment; aligned rows do not come with a certificate of good behaviour.

18 points
FE
FelixAdams0110
Replying to GraceChen1190

Who handles the incomplete pallet when an order ends, Grace? I'd hate to see the full-layer pattern finally sorted and then have the shift invent the last half-layer beside it.

19 points
GR
GraceChen1190
Replying to FelixAdams0110

Packing lead handles short orders. We haven't put that condition into the review yet.

17 points
FE
FelixAdams0110
Replying to GraceChen1190

Bring them in while the alternatives are still drawings, then, because a pattern that needs a whole layer every time may change the work more than losing two carton positions.

21 points
EL
ElliotAdams0161
Replying to GraceChen1190

Any answer from packaging on the original gaps? That's still the basic unknown.

20 points
GR
GraceChen1190
Replying to ElliotAdams0161

Original edge position isn't acceptable to packaging. Lower-count candidate needs filled-load and tooling checks next.

8 points
JA
JasperCarter0986
Replying to GraceChen1190

That gives dispatch a real reason to price the alternative, Grace. I'd keep short-order handling alongside those extra pallet movements so the comparison doesn't quietly assume every order fills the new pattern either.

11 points

Add to the discussion

Welcome to Application Robot

Everyone can read the forum. Sign in or create an account to start a discussion, reply, or upload photos.

Forgot your password?

By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Conditions and community guidelines. Read our Privacy Policy for how your information is handled.