Start with the measured machine opening and parked door around the complete tool carrying the blank, then check the connected entry, release and exit rather than two endpoints; keep the setter's work space in the same layout
Have the toolmaker state the intended grip depth before assembling the view, otherwise the carried blank can quietly move inside the fingers every time somebody needs more clearance.
Does a different approach preserve the grip and the process requirements? I'd want that answer before anyone calls it solved by rotating the drawing. The machine lead should also confirm which door arrangement is actually available in use.
And don't move the handle or change the door arrangement as an unpriced convenience, Simon, any proposed machine change needs its proper owner and review
That leaves a defined alternative to assess, not an approved route yet. Keep the complete return and the setter's access in its scope; the first conflict disappearing would be useful progress, but not the whole arm-selection decision.