the UR5e stop has three different names in our notes

JamieChan1078 · 31 Jul 2025, 03:11 UTC

Closed
JA
JamieChan1078
Our imported UR5e spacer job pauses and the notes call it tray fault, grip fault and robot stopped; the Alibaba seller wants more detail than my video, and I think we've given one problem three names without actually identifying it.

11 replies

SA
SarahBrooks0850
Replying to JamieChan1078

Our fleet reports improved when we separated what the operator saw from what they thought caused it; can you match one of those notes to the station message and event time?

9points
JA
JamieChan1078
Replying to SarahBrooks0850

Yep, tray fault matches a screenshot saying waiting outlet available; grip fault has no timestamp, so I can't honestly attach it to the same occurrence.

18points
SA
SarahBrooks0850
Replying to JamieChan1078

Use the matched occurrence first and leave the other note unassigned; does the integrator explain what outlet available means in that sequence?

10points
JA
JamieChan1078
Replying to SarahBrooks0850

I've found their sequence note; outlet is the receiving nest, not the tray the operator had just changed.

8points
DA
DanielAli0217
Replying to JamieChan1078

That would explain why the tray photograph wasn't answering support's question.

17points
AN
AnikaBell0682
Replying to JamieChan1078

Which confirmation tells the sequence that the receiving nest is available?

21points
JA
JamieChan1078
Replying to AnikaBell0682

The note names receiving-nest clear; controls is checking its source because the screen only says outlet and nobody on shift uses that name.

11points
SA
SarahBrooks0850
Replying to JamieChan1078

Have the operator and support use receiving nest beside the existing message for now, so the next report points to the same place while controls investigates.

9points
JA
JamieChan1078
Replying to SarahBrooks0850

Added to the shift note, thanks Sarah; one labelled occurrence sent, with the other undated note kept separate rather than squeezed into the story.

17points
DA
DanielAli0217
Replying to JamieChan1078

Has controls found why the clear confirmation was missing?

23points
HA
HanaBarnes0535
Replying to DanielAli0217

Jamie, do you know that it was missing at the source yet? The message might tell you what the sequence wanted, but I'd want the capture before deciding where that information disappeared.

17points

Discussion closed

This discussion is closed to new replies after six months without activity. Last activity: .