Measure it released, on the supports specified for inspection. Hand pressure changes the check.
Our bracket sits flat only while somebody holds it down
MinaAli0250 · 17 Oct 2025, 00:56 UTC
20 replies
We had a bench with a high spot that made everything look bent. I'd get inspection to check the example somewhere known first. Cheap enough to rule out.
6 pointsLuis, yes on the bench, but please don't let a better bench turn into a proposal to clamp the finished bracket flatter, the customer gets it without that clamp
17 pointsSeen a demonstration done with one bolt nipped up through the foot. Looked excellent. Nobody mentioned the bolt until we asked to lift the bracket. Get the loose part in front of inspection before arguing about the new fixture.
9 pointsIt rocks on inspection's surface too, Luis, and Sarah they have taken it away to check the drawing supports properly, so at least I am not buying the bench a robot
8 pointsWho decides whether correction is allowed after welding?
14 pointsThat needs the responsible quality and engineering people, Liam. The handover also needs to say who handles parts that fail; otherwise correction becomes somebody quietly leaning on them.
25 pointsKeep the example identified while it moves about. Ours got mixed with a corrected one on a trolley. Lost the afternoon explaining two different measurements of two different brackets.
18 pointsWe priced a fixture on the assumption it would remove all straightening. Didn't happen. I'd want the quote to show the remaining correction work honestly, but I wouldn't bin a useful fixture just because it cannot do everything.
20 pointsAgreed Felix, provided someone establishes a permitted correction method and what gets checked afterwards, otherwise the supposed saving is just work disappearing from the estimate
19 pointsWhy is the loose bracket not the acceptance sample in the first place?
6 pointsOscar, the sample was chosen because its welds looked good, which is fair for the weld discussion but somebody then called it our approved assembly; Toby, thanks, it now has its own tag and inspection photo
17 pointsDoes the drawing allow that rocking, or is a measured feature actually out?
14 pointsGood question Sarah. Rocking got us excited on another job when the important feature was the hole position. Still needed checking, but we were arguing about the wrong thing first.
10 pointsSarah, the foot flatness is outside the drawing requirement on this one, inspection used revision D, and the hole positions passed, so we finally have something less vague than wobbly
0 pointsThat gives the fixture designer a real problem to discuss. Any other released samples available? One bad bracket tells you it happened. Wouldn't price the whole production story around just that one.
21 pointsAnd keep corrected samples in a separate group. Labelled, not thrown out.
11 pointsThanks for naming revision D, Mina. Can the fixture review use that same revision? I have seen a purchasing attachment lag behind the drawing inspection actually used.
17 pointsDid the designer change the proposed fixture, or are you still collecting brackets? Curious whether this has altered the buying decision yet.
15 pointsStill collecting, Felix, and Ada the quote attachment was revision C so I have sent D and asked them to update it; I am not rejecting the fixture, just refusing to pretend the nice-looking sample settled it
15 pointsDiscussion closed
This discussion is closed to new replies after six months without activity. Last activity: .