Applications & integration

Machine tending, welding, palletising, and end-of-arm tooling.

Start a discussion

3,716discussions

Who can approve the UR5e layer when packaging and tooling need different changes?

NathanAdams0112 · 18 points · Applications & integration · 27 Jul 2026

20replies O

Fifty days later I still cannot compare these FR10 contact pads

OwenAllen0312 · 19 points · Applications & integration · 27 Jul 2026

20replies E

support review for the rotated FR5 carton layer

ElliotAdams0161 · 31 points · Applications & integration · 27 Jul 2026

11replies F

those rotated cases need more than a neat dispatch drawing

FarahCarter1026 · 36 points · Applications & integration · 27 Jul 2026

1replies O

I need the packaging answer behind the FR10 layer drawing

OliverArcher0363 · 8 points · Applications & integration · 27 Jul 2026

6replies V

How do I review FR10 carton support without losing the tool's exit space?

VeraCasey · 20 points · Applications & integration · 27 Jul 2026

20replies L

Why is the FR10 pattern still awaiting support evidence after the carton outline is done?

LinArcher0357 · 20 points · Applications & integration · 27 Jul 2026

6replies A

component cases fit the UR5e layer but their supports cross gaps

AmaraBrooks0861 · 34 points · Applications & integration · 27 Jul 2026

0replies H

Component-case support and UR5e release need one review

HarishAli0228 · 14 points · Applications & integration · 27 Jul 2026

10replies S

Which restrained bracket check can be compared with our released acceptance?

SamAllen0333 · 5 points · Applications & integration · 27 Jul 2026

19replies

Applications & integration

Our bracket notes lose the dimensional story between restraint and acceptance

What should replace the torch line in my FR5 bracket layout review?

Different UR5e pads leave our shell-transfer trial unanswered

Which bracket records describe the part before correction?

Can I stop my pouch trial even though the UR5e motion works?

What support finding belongs beside this UR5e carton pattern?

What did the old bracket correction hide after release?

What would make the smooth-carton vacuum demo relevant to my packing bench?

Released bracket fails where the restrained check looks aligned

Who reviews support and withdrawal on my UR5e dispatch pattern?

Who can approve the UR5e layer when packaging and tooling need different changes?

Fifty days later I still cannot compare these FR10 contact pads

support review for the rotated FR5 carton layer

those rotated cases need more than a neat dispatch drawing

I need the packaging answer behind the FR10 layer drawing

How do I review FR10 carton support without losing the tool's exit space?

Why is the FR10 pattern still awaiting support evidence after the carton outline is done?

component cases fit the UR5e layer but their supports cross gaps

Component-case support and UR5e release need one review

Which restrained bracket check can be compared with our released acceptance?